June 2008 Press Release   November 2007 Press Release

 

An updated version of Cumbria Under Siege will be maintained here.

 

This is an updated map (April 2009) and the numbers in the November Press Release do not now match exactly.   The key immediately below the map is accurate at the time of uploading.

 

 

 

No.

CUMBRIAN WIND FARMS AND STATUS – JUNE 2008

Name

No. turbines

Status

1

Great Orton

6

Operating

2

Newlands Mill

2

Operating

3

High Pow

3

Operating

4

Wharrel’s Hill

8

Operating

5

Winscales 1&2

18

Operating

6

Siddick

7

Operating

7

Oldside

9

Operating

8

Lowca

7

Operating

9

Haverigg 1, 2, 3

9

Operating

10

Barrow Offshore

30

Operating

11

Kirkby Moor

12

Operating

12

Far Old Park

7

Operating

13

Harlock Hill

5

Operating

14

Lambrigg

5

Operating

15

Pirelli

2

Operating

16

Robin Rigg Offshore

60

Consented by Government - In construction

17

Voridian

2

                                        - In construction

18

Sandale

-

Pre-Planning

19

Westnewton

5

Appeal withdrawn June 2008

20

Prospect & Oughterside

6

Planning

21

Wardhall Common

3

Planning

22

Tallentire Hill

5

Planning (RES)

23

Fleeter Wood (was Townhead, Dearham)

5-8

Planning (Novera Energy)

24

Stainburn

-

Planning

25

Broughton Moor

7

Planning

26

Workington

24

Planning

27

Fairfiald/Pica

6

Planning

28

Keekle

24

Scoping/Planning

29

Standish Cote

10

Scoping/Planning

30

Striber’s Allotment

6

Scoping/Planning (Energie in Natura)

31

Dalton Crag

5

Pre-planning (Eon)

32

Armistead

9

Planning (Gamesa)

33

Crab Tree Farm

3

Pre-planning

34

Killington

?

Pre-planning

35

Firbank Fell

?

Pre-planning

36

Crosby Garrett

?

Pre-planning

37

Hoff Moor

3

Rejected at Public Inquiry, March 2008al

38

Shap Renewable Energy Park

10

Planning (Gamesa)

39

Berrier Hill (Greystoke)

9

Planning (West Coast Energy)

40

Lamonby

5

Planning (Eon)

41

Grise (Skelton)

9

Planning

42

High Raise

?

Pre-planning

43

Alston Moor

?

Pre-planning

44

Thack Moor

?

Pre-planning

45

Leaps Rigg

?

Pre-planning

46

Hill Top Farm

-

Rejected

47

Hell Rigg (Silloth)

4-6

Rejected but re-submission expected

48

Brownrigg Hall (Allonby)

5

Rejected

49

Drigg

-

Rejected

50

Gunson Heights

16

Rejected

51

Lowick Common

6

Rejected

52

Barkin House

6

Rejected in 1998. Now in re-scoping

53

Whinash

27

Rejected by Secretary of State, 3/2006

54

Whinfell

-

Unlikely in light of Whinash decision

55

Greyrigg

-

Unlikely in light of Whinash decision

56

Pack Horse Hill

-

Unlikely in light of Whinash decision

57

Flimby

3

Planning (West Coast Energy)

58

Walney Island offshore

93-125

Consented by Government, 7 Nov. 2007

59

High Haume

?

Pre-planning

60

Lazonby Fell

?

Pre-planning (Eon)

61

Nanny Hall (High Biggins)

6-7

Pre-Planning (Eon)

62

Sillfield

4

Planning (Novera)

63

Cumwhinton

3

Pre-planning (Balsterstone plc)

Red = Operating;    Blue = consented/in construction;    Green = Planning (various stages);    Black = Rejected

 

 

PRESS RELEASE for IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 7th 2008

 

FELLS calls for a rethink on South Lakes landscape

 

 

At its ninth Annual General Meeting on June 5th in Kirkland Hall Kendal, attended by over 40 people, an urgent call was made for a halt to the uncontrolled flood of applications for wind farms sweeping through the South Lakeland area.

 

In the past six months four new applications have emerged; Armistead near Old Hutton (now in the planning stage), Sill Field on a site adjacent to this, Biggins/Whittington just 1 mile from Kirkby Lonsdale Town centre and Striber/Ellerside on a ridge near Grange-over-Sands. If approved these would total up to 25 extra turbines on top of the 13 already operating at Caton Moor and Lambrigg.

 

Sir Christopher Audland, the first Chairman and a founder of FELLS said, ‘…this should come as a wake up call to everyone in South Lakeland. Most of these proposals would be on sites that have already been recognised as meeting or almost meeting National Park standards. The low ridge between the Kent and the Lune Valleys is of exceptional quality and we should all press hard for its inclusion in a new Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty – because that is what it is’.

 

Much of this area is already under review by Natural England as part of its ongoing study of the Yorkshire Dales and Lake District National Park boundaries. The fact that it is now being ‘picked off’ piecemeal by subsidy-hungry developers borders on a National disgrace and will seriously prejudice the impartiality of this review.

 

Tim Kimber, the present Chairman of FELLS, added that ‘…in just a few years the total cost of this crazy rush for wind energy could be costing the average household £300 to £400 a year extra in fuel bills via the hidden subsidies and high cost of grid strengthening and building new back up coal and gas-fired power plants to support the wind farms when the wind does not blow’ (up to 110 days per year).

 

Notably Paul Golby, the CEO of Eon UK said only this week that we would need as much as 44 gigawatts of new coal or gas generation capacity by 2020 to back up wind if the Government persists with its present policy. That is the equivalent of 20 large coal-fired power stations or 60 burning gas.

 

Sadly, Kirkby Lonsdale Town Council and Casterton Parish Council voted not to opposed the Armistead proposal despite being warned by FELLS that several other wind farm plans were about to be revealed. In so doing they are putting at risk the tourist life blood of Kirkby Lonsdale and have betrayed all those people who, in the past, fought to keep the M6, reservoirs and additional pylons out of the Lune Valley.

 

 

 

 

 

Mike Hall, FELLS Vice-Chairman said; ‘…this is all about greed not green. The landowners who are permitting this scandal to happen should recognise that while they own the land they do not own the landscape. That is the legacy and birthright of us all. In encouraging this blight they are degrading the enjoyment of hundreds of local people and thousands of visitors who come here to recharge their batteries’.

 

FELLS urges everyone to object in the strongest possible terms to what is happening and calls on all organisations with an interest in the landscape to unite to prevent the destruction of South Lakeland. We have won in the past and we can win again.

 

 

 

 

 

Press release on behalf of FELLS - Friends of Eden, Lakeland and Lunesdale Scenery, November 2007

This week FELLS has sent a letter to Councillors and Members of Parliament from across Cumbria, entitled "Cumbria under Siege".

 

The intention is to draw attention to the ever increasing number of wind farm proposals across the county.  FELLS members are concerned that the  "unrealistic" renewable energy target for the county has been set without regard to the fact that over half of the area is protected by designation, such as the National Park.  This is putting huge pressure on the remainder of the land, such as the Eden Valley.  The letter to councillors points out that "The Regional Authorities simply looked at land area and the wind profile of the county without making allowance for its unique nature."

 

Enclosed with the letter is a map showing  sites around the Lake District National Park.  There are currently over 30 wind farms at the scoping or planning stage, including the controversial Berrier Hill site, and since the map was produced, a proposal for a wind farm at Lazonby Fell has come to light.  Tim Kimber, Chairman of FELLS  writes: "Although a few might be deemed to be acceptable, many are sited in completely unsuitable areas".  

 

The letter asks councillors at all levels of government to continue to be bold and vigilant and to work to protect this unique county for the enjoyment of future generations".

 

Kyle Blue, who was prominent in the Whinash wind farm inquiry said "The Public Inquiry highlighted  the importance of the countryside to Cumbria and its economy.  It is therefore essential that these intrusive developments are closely monitored  and only sited where appropriate."

 

 

November 2007

Dear

Cumbria under Siege

Some three years ago FELLS produced a map of the county showing the then existing spread of wind farms, windfarm applications and those rejected. Since then the Whinash Public Inquiry has taken place resulting in rejection by the Secretary of State. Despite that, windfarm companies are bombarding the county with ever more applications. We believe this is being driven by fear about the future of the lucrative Renewable Obligation regime. Any dilution of the scheme would markedly cut the exceptional profitability enjoyed by onshore wind farms – deservedly so since they have been shown to make an insignificant net contribution to reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

It is important to recognise that Cumbria is one of the most splendid and unspoiled counties in England: We are fortunate to possess the very finest landscape south of the Scottish border. That is why about 48% of the county is designated as a National Park, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty or a Heritage Coast. A further 7% is currently under review by Natural England. That landscape sustains much of Cumbria’s economy and employment. For these reasons we believe our renewable energy target for 2010 is highly unrealistic. The Regional Authorities simply looked at land area and the wind profile of the county without making allowance for its unique nature.

Because of this combination of factors, FELLS have updated the map (copy enclosed). It is critical that councillors at all levels of local government continue to be vigilant towards these applications. Although a few might be deemed to be acceptable, many are sited in completely unsuitable areas or combine with other windfarms to produce an entirely unacceptable cumulative impact – a matter regarded as vitally important in the recently adopted Cumbria County Council Wind Energy Supplementary Planning Document. We urge you to be bold and vigilant and to work to protect this unique county for the enjoyment of future generations by turning down windfarm applications that are clearly in inappropriate and uneconomic locations.

 

Details from the Cumbria under Siege map

No.

Name

No. turbines

Status

1

Great Orton

6

Operating

2

Newlands Mill

2

Operating

3

High Pow

3

Operating

4

Wharrel’s Hill

8

Operating

5

Winscales 1&2

18

Operating

6

Siddick

7

Operating

7

Oldside

9

Operating

8

Lowca

7

Operating

9

Haverigg 1, 2, 3

9

Operating

10

Barrow Offshore

30

Operating

11

Kirkby Moor

12

Operating

12

Far Old Park

7

Operating

13

Harlock Hill

5

Operating

14

Lambrigg

5

Operating

15

Pirelli

2

Operating

16

Robin Rigg Offshore

60

Consented by Government - In construction

17

Voridian

2

In construction

18

Sandale

-

Planning

19

Westnewton

5

Planning

20

Prospect & Oughterside

6

Planning

21

Wardhall Common

3

Planning

22

Tallentire Hill

5

Planning (RES)

23

Fleeter Wood (was Townhead, Dearham)

5-8

Planning (Novera Energy)

24

Stainburn

-

Planning

25

Broughton Moor

7

Planning

26

Workington

24?

Planning

27

Fairfiald/Pica

6

Planning

28

Keekle

24

Scoping/Planning

29

Standish Cote

10

Pre-planning

30

Striber’s Allotment

?

Pre-planning

31

Dalton Crag

5

Pre-planning (Eon)

32

Armistead

9

Pre-Planning (Gamesa)

33

Crab Tree Farm

3

Pre-planning

34

Killington

?

Pre-planning

35

Firbank Fell

?

Pre-planning

36

Crosby Garrett

?

Pre-planning

37

Hoff Moor

3

Planning Inquiry shortly for appeal

38

Shap Renewable Energy Park

10

Planning (Gamesa)

39

Berrier Hill (Greystoke)

9

Planning (West Coast Energy)

40

Lamonby

5

Planning (Eon)

41

Grise (Skelton)

9

Planning

42

High Raise

?

Pre-planning

43

Alston Moor

?

Pre-planning

44

Thack Moor

?

Pre-planning

45

Leaps Rigg

?

Pre-planning

46

Hill Top Farm

-

Rejected

47

Hell Rigg (Silloth)

4-6

Rejected but re-submission expected

48

Brownrigg Hall (Allonby)

5

Rejected

49

Drigg

-

Rejected

50

Gunson Heights

16

Rejected

51

Lowick Common

6

Rejected

52

Barkin House

6

Rejected

53

Whinash

27

Rejected by Secretary of State, 3/2006

54

Whinfell

-

Unlikely in light of Whinash decision

55

Greyrigg

-

Unlikely in light of Whinash decision

56

Pack Horse Hill

-

Unlikely in light of Whinash decision

PROPOSALS NOT SHOWN THAT EMERGED AFTER MAP WAS COMPLETED

A1

Flimby

3

Planning (West Coast Energy)

A2

Lazonby Fell

-

Pre-Planning (Eon)

A3

Walney Island off-shore

93-152

Consented by Government 7th  Nov 2007